THE TWILIGHT ZONE

I just read an article saying that the oldest Australian Aboriginal site was just found and that it was about 40,000 years old. I’ve also often read that all people alive today are descended from a few thousand Homo Sapiens that lived in Northeastern Africa about 20,000 years ago. It seems fairly likely that there were non-human hominids in many parts of the world (mostly Europe and Asia) that weren’t related to modern humans (including Australian Aborigines alive today). It also means that all humans alive today are descended from dark skinned people. Note that dark skin has nothing to do with intelligence. It has to do with how close to the equator one’s ancestors evolved. These things tend to get ignored – particularly in the US – because of their potential to be misused by racial bigots.

My favorite is the gigantopithicus. S/he lived 300,000 years ago for sure but is thought to have died out. I've talked to people that think this is an erroneous assumption though..




If anyone would screw around with hybridizing these guys it would be Russia..

Hi there Sil.

I guess as long as we keep acting like animals we'll look like animals.

On second thought, I don't think animals can compare to man-kinds deviousness and blood lust.

Uhmmm...Sil, could you please upload the thumbnail of that whale-sized pic please?

And btw, the large eyebrow of that Russian boxer is not caused by any relation to Neanderthals, it's nothing but scar tissue.

_________________
Zoom! What was that? That was your life, Mate! That was quick, do I get another? Sorry, Mate. Back to the world of dreams. Yes, dear? ...

Oh I don't know Abe, The other boxer has no pronounced scar tissue at the eyebrows and our giant boxer will take nowhere near the hits in the face the smaller boxers will.

Scar tissue it may be, but perhaps the Neanderthals shape was scar tissue also.

Did our friendly boxing giant have those shaped eyebrows before he started boxing?

The similarity to Neanderthal is striking and perhaps a genetic throwback?

We all have our peculiar weaknesses and Silhouette’s appears to be an attraction to apelike giant men. This attraction does not appear to be archeological. Often when women have this desire it’s because they are expressing a secret wish to have sex with a violent and domineering father who they believe they can ‘tame’ with sex. This wish – usually in their childhood – affects their choice of mate for the rest of their lives.

I was recently watching a DVD of 2001 a space Odyssey when I noticed on the closing credits that a Glenn Beck was named. I thought it would be ironic if it turned out to be the same Glenn Beck that currently plays a commentator on the Fox News Network. It would also be interesting if the minor role that he played in the movie was the intelligent ape that the space aliens taught to use an animal bone as a tool. As soon as the aliens left the ape started using the bone to hit his fellow apes with until they died. This is the theme of Glenn Beck’s as well as Fox News’ behavior and also the thing that the book that inspired the movie is based on. It also explains why space people never contact earth people since no self respecting space alien would want to associate with such a violent and delusional people (we think that use of tools is intelligent but a major use of tools is as weapons which we use to beat fellow people with until they die (sometimes symbolically)).

"We all have our peculiar weaknesses and Silhouette’s appears to be an attraction to apelike giant men."

Sil is attracted to Abe...what are you saying about Abe?

Yes, I'm attracted to Valuev. You nailed me [pun intended]. I secretly want to use sex to dominate a larger male.


Back to the subject...

If you look closely at the she-bigfoot's facial structure closeup you can see the oddly contorted jawline and ridged skull that seems to lack a high forehead but instead slopes quite noticeably backwards and swoops up to a crest. Valuev has almost the same exact features down to the detail.

And as roady pointed out Abe, I seriously doubt that anyone has ever landed even one blow to that man's brow ridge that would cause any scarring at all. The russians have tried all manner of odd experiments that the West may be involved in also but would never admit to. If these creatures exist and can interbreed with humans as some of the quite-well documented historical accounts attest to, you'd better believe the russians would like to have an army of men just like Valuev to work the front lines in any war.

Just saying..

Sorry Abe, the size of the pictures on my PC aren't as large as you describe. And they need to be big in this instance to show the subtle features I'm trying to describe. Now, below, instead of imagining the bigfoot face as bald to compare, imagine Valuev's face all covered with the fluffy hair. Pretty damn close and fascinating to consider.. Valuev looks exactly like what you would expect to get from crossing a bigfoot with one of us. I breed animals for a living and let me tell you if these were sheep, goats or horses we were talking about, any honest breeder would acknowledge the obvious relationship in phenotype.

And that would be Doggerland, so I will split this thread.

No Sil, I am talking about that composite pic. You have it saved on Photobucket, and I know you can post a thumbnail instead (provided by Photobucket/ a thumbnail is a small, clickable picture that directs you to the original sized picture).

The large eyebrows of that Russian boxer are nothing but scar tissue. I heard it from a doctor when I watched a documentary about him on tv.

Another thing: Neanderthals were a lot shorter than we are now, nothing at all like this present-day giant.

And if you say that one of his ancestors might have been a BigFoot, I'd say it's not possible. If that was true, we could have offsping with gorillas.

_________________
Zoom! What was that? That was your life, Mate! That was quick, do I get another? Sorry, Mate. Back to the world of dreams. Yes, dear? ...

Bigfoot has been described as a bipedal hairy man, not a quadruped ape Abe. Vast difference there and so I would suspect different DNA. There is no proof one way or another as to them not being able to interbreed with homo sapiens but there are several documented accounts of them being able to..

So you say his browridge is scar tissue, then is his lack of forehead and extreme-sloping skull [side profile] dishing back up to a crest [just like the bigfoot creature] also a result of "scar tissue"?

Is his huge and odd jaw [also shaped and proportioned just like BF] also "scar tissue"? There are too many similarities to write off so easily. Also note the eyes and the extraordinarily high-placed cheekbones. The nose, lips and mouth are all very very close and oriented very much like the BF. Like I said, take the hair off the BF or add it to him and it would be like you're staring at the same picture. The BFonly appears to have a slightly higher crest at the rear of the skull. This guy Valuev's skull is not shaped like a typical homo sapien's at all..

The person that writes the posts of ‘Blackbeard’ is probably not the fierce and domineering pirate that the real Blackbeard was but it does explain Sil’s attraction to ‘him’. There was a giant skeleton dug up in Ireland I think that had very dense bones and a bony skull crest – symptoms of calcium poisoning which is sometimes caused when a person gets too much vitamin D (which helps the body absorb calcium). This is an unusual vitamin in that it is usually absorbed through the skin in a reaction with sunlight. Our ancestors evolved near the equator and got too much sunlight so their skin, eyes and hair became heavily pigmented. When they migrated to the upper latitudes they would have had to lose most of that pigmentation or die from calcium deficiency. It is thought that this disorder of calcium absorption made good warriors since they would have had nearly unbreakable bones and looked fairly big and fierce. If Goliath existed he probably would have had this deficiency (or been a Klingon).

Sil, you're assuming that the still photo is of an actual bigfoot.

But it's still being debated whether the Patterson film is a hoax or not;

Patterson-Gimlin_film

Hi Shawn.

Gee whiz, it's been debated since 1969 and no clear answer yet?

That's the nice thing about individual thoughts and ideas....we can get together and discuss them and agree to dis-agree.

Meanwhile we can enjoy each other and advance spiritually, unless of course you are SO advanced that everything to you is cut and dried accordingly to your humble opinion.

How little you know..or even anything at all..don't make me laugh.
What you call neanderthalersss..are the same as the so called pre Adamites.
A kind indeed with the same physical form existing for thousants of years.
But..not..with the same kind of spiritual bagage at all.
When will you wake up?

That's why I say you're dead.
You..don't understand anything at all.
Nothing..and all you hear is your own bark..in which you want to put your thrust.
Such poverty and missfit.
What will it take to open your eyes?
You think I'm crazy?
I know..you are a zillion more times crazy as I have ever been.
Like a leaf in the wind.
Just like a fog..a mist in the creation of time.
Your life is only a moment..soon to disappear.
Unless..you are prepared to listen.
Listen.